Thursday, October 14, 2010

Week 7 notes

1) Tyson, Jeff. http://computer.howstuffworks.com/internet-infrastructure.htm/printable
It is strange that we think of the Internet as a single thing, but it really is a lot of small connections.  I never thought about how every computer online connects to every other.  


I liked reading about routers because obviously I own one but I never really thought about its purpose.  I knew it send the information where it needs to go, but I didn't know it made sure that information didn't go where it's not needed.  I guess that is really important when there is such a large amount of information (as we saw illustrated in the Google video below).


I did know what an IP address and URL were (which was a relief, because a lot of the acronyms we read about for this class are new to me!).  But this was a good review.  I am continually, happily surprised at how concise and helpful the readings are for this class.

2) Andrew K. Pace (2004). Dismantling Integrated Library Systems. Library Journal, 129(2), p.34-36.
This article was a little bit technical for me, but I thought the CEO made an interesting comment: When building a new system, you should use the "same intellectual logic" from the original.  I think that's a good rule of thumb; you can constantly tweak systems to meet the current technological needs, but the purpose and logic still have to be there.


I thought the "better costs more" part was interesting, too.  Libraries do need to realize that these systems cost a ton if they expect them to do all these things.  You get what you pay for!  Unfortunately, libraries are dealing with a crunch on their budgets just as these technologies become more important.



3) Sergey Brin and Larry Page: Inside the Google machine.
    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/sergey_brin_and_larry_page_on_google.html

The world graphic at the beginning of the video was awesome.  It also showed the awesome reach of Google.  Only Africa was mostly dark.  He said that even the international space station would have a dot if it were in the map.  Then the map showed the links of where in the world information was traveling -- all over.  And the flash of one second of Google traffic showed the amount and variety of searches.


I think it's awesome that when one of their developers wants to do something, Google "pretty much lets them do it."  You never know what the next big thing will be, and Google is making a smart move in letting its workers explore.  It also keeps them happy.  They "try things out for fun and see where it goes."  Larry Page said something like many useful things come out of hobbies.  I didn't know Google News came about that way.  (I use it almost daily.)


Also, as an aside -- Brin and Page are funny!  I guess I should have expected that from the guys behind Google, which is such an innovative company.

3 comments:

  1. I would like to focus on the "better costs more" bit in your reaction to the article by Andrew K. Pace. I will not deny that the incorporation of such equipment into libraries can be very expensive. However, what some libraries may fail to realize is that quality should not be equated by the price tag. I am not just making references to cases where the name sells more than the actual product. A program can be full of so many intricate features, and yet do not seem to as a whole fulfill any practical purpose. People just want to buy these technologies, simply because they want to obtain the bragging rights of owning something that can do a lot of so-called neat stuff. In the end, the owners are forced to confront the reality that they have absolutely no clue on what to make of what they bought. What makes the situation all the more tragic is that libraries and archives end up filing for bankruptcy in their attempts to look "cool." This goes to show that technological transitions need to take place at a steady pace.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also thought the idea of maintaining the same, if not linear logic when implementing a new system was good to hear. I could see it being very tempting to 'go for the gusto' and radically change everything, but I guess that would like cause more problems than it would solve...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Kristen,

    I think that you made a good point with regards to how librarians need to be aware of the costs of integrated systems. But, does it stop there? Could there be a void in the market for creators/manufacturers to produce these types of systsm at a cheaper price? If so, do you think anything would have to give in terms of the quality of technology? What could librarians be willing to sacrifice? What could patrons be willing to tolerate?

    Adam Brody

    ReplyDelete